September 09, 2005

Spielberg angers terrorist

Not a terrorist sympathiserThis is criminal! I can't believe that a famous American film Director hasn't pampered to a murdering terrorist and involved them in his new movie! How inconsiderate not to have sat with him for ages to let him recite his tale and tell how great he is and generally incite others. Imagine how evil Spielberg must be not to have given him some enjoyment and allowed him to have a say in a movie that will show him to millions. From IMDB:

Steven Spielberg has been criticized by the only surviving Palestinian terrorist behind the massacre at the 1972 Olympics in Munich, Germany, because the director failed to consult him over his new movie dramatization of the tragic events.

Afraid you might get shown in a poor light? You're a terrorist mate, of course you will.

...was a member of terror group Black September in the early 1970s and was responsible for the deaths of 11 Israelis in Munich's Olympic Village...

...is so angry with Spielberg's supposedly pro-Israel stance in new film Munich, he contacted news agency Reuters to put forward his side of the story. He says, "If someone really wanted to tell the truth about what happened he should talk to the people involved, people who know the truth. Were I contacted, I would tell the truth."

Right, right, whatever your reasoning and the acts involved it does not give you the right to kidnap and murder people who are engaged in one of the biggest events that this World carries out. An event that brings diverse, and often warring, Countries together for a short period of time in the name of sport.

Frankly, politics aside, I don't think they have the right to be involved in this movie, although I can understand the point about authenticity. However how do we know which way the movie is going? There's so much speculation about this film and we haven't yet seen or heard anything concrete about it.


Posted by at September 9, 2005 04:02 AM


Comments

Is this fucker shitting us?! He's a liar, a terrorist and a murderer. Who the fuck wants to hear what he has to say or spin about what happened in Munich? I know I wouldn't and don't. Spielberg is under no obligation to contact this clearly ego-maniacal sicko for any reason. It's Steven's movie, not the terrorist's. He can script his own when he gets out of jail... Oh, right. I forgot. He's never getting out for what he did. Good. That means we can stop paying any attention to him whatsoever.

Posted by: Lilly (formerly John Campea's part-time fiance) at September 9, 2005 09:25 AM

Let's say, a palestinian director makes a film on Gaza terror and puts the terrorists (Israel) on the bad side. Suddenly a jewish terrorist claims that the director is not telling the truth, that the palestinian director should consult him before. Well... thank god the "terrorist" is in jail forever...

Posted by: Jason at September 9, 2005 10:56 AM

Well you got that one strait...

Posted by: Andy Pandy at September 9, 2005 10:58 AM

"I can't believe that a famous American film Director hasn't pampered to a murdering terrorist and involved them in his new movie!"

I believe the word you're looking for is "pandered."

Posted by: Pober Saltine at September 9, 2005 01:46 PM

Why is the guy even still alive?

Posted by: crackerjack at September 9, 2005 01:58 PM

I believe the words are, I don't care, try concentrating on the story.

Posted by: Richard Brunton at September 9, 2005 02:21 PM