Street Kings Review
Thanks for checking out our Street Kings Review. If you’d like, you can also watch this review in a video version at the bottom of this post.
Unless the film has the word “Matrix” in it someplace, long gone are the days when putting the name “Keanu Reeves” on the poster gets even the slightest amount of interest or excitement from me (if those days ever existed at all now that I think about it). Still, I’m a sucker for gritty cop movies, I think Chris Evans has a lot of potential and when was the last time Forest Whitaker turned in anything less than a solid effort? So despite the name “Keanu Reeves” being at the head of the poster, I’ve got to admit that Street Kings has had my attention. Was that attention warranted? Meh, not completely.
THE GENERAL IDEA
Keanu Reeves plays a tough street smart cop (don’t they always) who works with an elite unit in the Los Angeles Police Department (headed by Forest Whitaker) that quietly is willing to work outside the law in order to get things done, and then cover up their improper methods to make everything look legit. However, when one of the former members of this unit (and Reeves’ former partner) decides that what the unit is doing is wrong, he starts to rat the unit out to internal affairs and then is latter shot to death in an apparent store robbery, Reeves is driven to seek revenge against the criminals who killed his former partner by any means necessary. As he investigates the killing, he realizes the murder was more than just a simple hold up gone wrong. Together, he and an internal affairs agent played by Chris Evans begin following the clues, busting some heads and breaking some rules trying to find out just what the hell is going on.
THE GOOD
I know it’s predictable and almost cliche to say great things about Forest Whitaker’s performance in just about any film he’s in… but it’s the truth so I’ve got to do what is cliche and predictable. Whitaker has an ability to take just about any material that is handed to him and add so much character, passion (when called for) and power to it, that even if the movie or script is bad, he’ll FORCE his part to be something valuable and worthwhile in the film. Whenever the film feels like it’s starting to drag a bit, Forest Whitaker shows up on screen an instantly grabs your attention again. Easily his performance was the best part of the film.
If you’re going to attempt to make a “gritty cop film”, then you simply MUST have an intense and gritty feel (seems obvious I know, but how many times have we’ve seen these types of films flat out fail at this part?). Right from the opening credits of Street Kings the director David Ayer (who also directed Harsh Times and wrote the screenplays for films like Training Day, Dark Blue, Fast and the Furious and U571) does a solid jobs of creating that tense atmosphere throughout the film. It never feels too glossy which is a good thing.
The film is FAR from a comedy, but there were several moments and one liners in the film that had me laughing out loud (in a good way). I don’t have a lot of respect for Keanu Reeves as a performer, but I will admit that dry, sort of monotone cluelessness he brings to just about every single one of his characters does work pretty well in an environment like Street Kings when he drops funny lines.
THE BAD
If you’re going to make a film (be it a comedy, cop film, legal drama or sci-fi adventure) that has a mystery to be solved at its core, you absolutely can NOT let the resolution to that mystery be so completely obvious that 90% of the audience has the whole thing figured out by the time you hit the 20 minute mark of the movie. The air of the unknown makes every revelation and discovery throughout the film a hook that keeps the audience coming along with the movie for the ride… but when the outcome is so plainly and painfully obvious, those revelations and discoveries become nothing more than time filler between them and the end credits. The answer to the “mystery” in Street Kings is so transparent that I have a very hard time believing anyone in that theater didn’t have the whole thing figured out by the time they where half way through their popcorn (I’m usually done mine 10 minutes into the movie). As a matter of fact, I found myself internally screaming at Reeves’ character for being such an idiot and not figuring the whole thing out himself by the end of the first act.
The first half of the movie sets up the story fairly well, but from that point on so many of the situations and scenarios are so completely forced and ask the audience to stretch their imaginations and limits of believability so far that you just find yourself losing interest because apparently common sense means nothing in the Street Kings world.
Some of the dialog is horrendous. I just can’t say much more than that.
This one kills me, and ultimately totally killed the movie for me. When the “bad guys” are so “bad” and so evil and so debase that you feel like you’re watching an 80’s cartoon show. Films like Street Kings work when their characters are more realistic, and in the real world, even the “bad guys” have some areas of moral grey, some sense of struggle and some sense of conflict. Good people can do the worst things… bad people nightmarish unthinkable things… but they’re still human and not 1 dimensional cartoon characters who twirl their mustaches while titling their heads back laughing “MMuuuhahahahaha! Now I shall rape the babies in the hospital, kick pregnant teens in the uterus and cancel Christmas! MUUUHAHAHAHA!” Street Kings was already starting to lose me for all the above mentioned transgressions, but this is the one that made me close the book on the movie.
OVERALL
With a solid cast and an decent (if not original) premise, Street Kings had the potential to be a worth while film. A good opening and some witty dialog gets your hopes up for the first part of the film, only to have the massive failures of the movie start to become more and more conspicuous as the movie progresses. A painfully obvious resolution to the “mystery”, some horrible dialog and laughable villains end up making Street Kings not worth your $10. Overall I give Street Kings a 3.5 out of 10.
You can watch our Street Kings Review below.
If you have trouble playing the video review try refreshing your browser.
13 Comments, Comment or Ping
EZELL
I saw it last night and had great possibleiteis with the first scene but ended up being a disapoinment. I agree 100% on Johns review.
Apr 12th, 2008
EZELL
I give it a 4 out of then the opening scene was great other that meteoaker
Apr 12th, 2008
HisDivineShadow
Good review John I saw it yesterday as well.
I thought Reeves delivery only worked because his chracter was an alcholic burnout.
Forrest did steal every scene but his character was in charge so he had the floor all the time to go over the top.
Chris Evens did a great job and soldifies the fact that hed going to have a great career.
One thing I really think hurt the reality of the film was all the harsh rape talk the cops were into…wtf was that for?
Anyway I would give the film 5 out of 10.
Next up for Keanu, The Day the Earth Stood still…. Yikes.
Apr 12th, 2008
pete
pile of shit
Apr 12th, 2008
GODFATHER
Well, I’m going to have to disagree with the statements above, namely because although most of the movie was easily figured out, IMO it played out well. It’s not a “make you think” sort of movie. It’s (to use your term John) a popcorn flick; one where you don’t have to think about it. You just watch it to be entertained. Unlike you guys, I like Keanu’s flicks and the way he acts. Sure, it may be more mellow, but he’s a lot better than a lot of other actors out there, especially the tired Vince Vaughan and Will Ferrel. Also, unlike your tastes in this movie, I found Forest’s character dull, unintelligent, and weak, especially considering he’s the “team leader”. It’s not a great movie, but it is better than a lot of other crap being put out by Hollywood lately, and I’d rate it much higher at 7/10. Personally, I think you’re over-thinking what you were watching. Was there room for improvement? Most definitely, but it’s still got entertainment value.
Apr 13th, 2008
Jordan C
I would pay to see a movie with a 1 dimensional bad guy who shoots puppies in the face and kicks pregnant teens in the uterus then twirls his moustache. It’d actually be a unique storyline, and you’d get people buying tickets just so they could condemn it. :D
Apr 16th, 2008
Rod
I agree with all of John’s observations except his assessment of Whitaker’s character. His acting simply does not move me. He always appears to be “trying” as opposed to delivering. I would say that Common gave the best performance. The Game was a waste. My rating is 3/10. I was actually thinking “I don’t like this move” within the first 1/2 hour.
Apr 16th, 2008
Cheler
This Movie was dope! Or for you suburb ppl…I Loved this movie to say the least!..One Dim. bad guys is reality..where are you from??..
Cheler WestSide MS13 HoLlYWooD LokoS
Apr 16th, 2008
dan
Really liked this movie..Training Day, Harsh Times and now Street Kings. I love the world these films create. The only bit i thought was a bit cliched was the “shovel scene” - seen that a few times!
Cops are like weeds, pull one up and two grow back. For what it is trying to be I would give this movie 7.5.
Apr 19th, 2008
Vice
Yes it was predictable. I have to say that it is definitly better than most cop movies. I honestly thought that this review was a bit harsh but i do agree on most of its views.
Apr 22nd, 2008
wonder66
Why was this film released? Your telling me that it sat through a screening that let it be unleashed on us rather than straight to the dvd bargin bin. This film was made solely on a story line that was done years ago in “the shield” but the problem with this version is millions of dollors were wasted doing it badly. The story has been seen a thousand times but with none of the gritty drama or twists usually seen. In the begining you think it could be good when he goes off to save the missing twins but there are mistakes throughout. The film never actually explains that bit or how he knew where to look???? Reeves is monotoned and expressionless and he get the outcoming half hour after the audience. Half way through you find out he has a wife and she died. The audience dont care as this is a new revelation that has no substence - the drinking that occurs with this is also pointless as it has no effect on reeves or the storyline. the 2 undercover cops part is laughable as it is unbelievable (and no in a good way) and it doesnt actually explain why they are undercover. The money in the wall and the cop kidnap is irritating as this is what you get after 90 minutes or boredom. If you liked this film I recommend renting the shield or training day again as these are of a high quality and you dont feel cheated. watching for 90 minutes to get an twist (if you can call it that) when you are told of what happened and you have never seen it played out on screen makes you wonder what the hell they were doing in the cutting room floor and if they cut out the wrong parts of the movie and screened the excess. Good things in this film Chris Evans and High Laurie dont make you want to peel the skin from your right arm just to have something else to do. Unlike reeves who I think has overplayed himself and maybe he should go to acting classes before subjecting me to another numb bum for a bum film.
Apr 26th, 2008
Joseph Ferrarelli
I thought this entire movie was terrible.
Forrest Whitaker’s performance stood out as being over the top and so melodramatic, I was waiting for someone to offer him a juice box and tell him to relax. I didn’t buy him for a second.
Also, the twist-twist-twisty McTwistersons got old real fast.
Actually, I thought the most enjoyable part was Christ Evans, since David Ayer missed him with the melodrama ray until the end (and come on, who didn’t see that coming?).
Apr 27th, 2008
Movies Corner
Great movie for me. I found Street Kings Wallpapers if someone need them :)
May 9th, 2008
Reply to “Street Kings Review”