Lindsay Lohan Poses Nude In Marilyn Monroe Tribute
It looks like Lindsay Lohan has decided to celebrate her nudity with the world! We get the following details, and were made aware of this story thanks to our friends at cinematical:
She’s done the DUI thing. She’s done the rehab thing. Now, Lindsay Lohan is mounting her comeback by posing completely nude — as Marilyn Monroe — in New York Magazine. The photos are meant to re-create Monroe’s famous 1962 shoot, shot by Bert Stone, called The Last Sitting. Says NY Mag: “But the pictures are also remarkable for the raw truths they seem to reveal. In them, we see an actress whose comedic talents were overshadowed by her sex appeal, a woman who is cannily aware of her pinup status, yet is also beginning to show her 36 years. In many shots, she is obviously drunk. This was an unhappy time for Monroe.”
I think this is a good move for Lohan. I have long thought that she should celebrate debauchery and become a B-Movie starlet championing the art of sleaze and trash. This is a foot forward in that direction, and I am certainly delighted. Now all we need is for her to star in a few women in prison movies and she will be set up nicely to follow in the footsteps of legends like Sybil Danning and Lana Clarkson (RIP).
Although I think her heart was in the right place, I do not like this photoset. Lohan isn’t a good Marilyn; Anna Nicole should have done this set when she was alive. Lohan looks much, much better as a brunette; the blonde just does not work on her and she needs to dye that shit back pronto. If she is willing to pose nude, she should certainly contact the good people over at Playboy. They will create pictures that flatter her look and character; rather than wasting her precious time and nudity with an awkward homage.
To see Lindsay’s full photo set please go here, then come back and discuss. My favorite picture is the one posted above - please share with us your personal favorite.
1. Vek replies at 18th February 2008, 1:09 pm :
“I think this is a good move for Lohan. I have long thought that she should celebrate debauchery and become a B-Movie starlet championing the art of sleaze and trash.”
Marilyn Monroe was not a B-Movie starlet championing the art of sleaze and trash so emitting Monroe won’t lead to such.
2. bret replies at 18th February 2008, 1:50 pm :
he meant that by mimicking such an icon it would lead her down a path, not that monroe herself was a B level celeb. All these pics did was show that she is not on the same level that monroe does. dont get me wrong, she is a beautiful girl but these pics are not her best.
3. Mozzerino replies at 18th February 2008, 1:51 pm :
Yeah Lindsay, show the twins! After all you’re movie career is kind of over, so why not get naked now! I smell a Playboy shoot coming next.
Seriously, what looked hot with Monroe, looks just slutty with Lohan.
4. bret replies at 18th February 2008, 1:52 pm :
EDIT** same level that monroe was on.
5. Omar replies at 18th February 2008, 1:56 pm :
I’ve wanted to see Lohan naked ever since I saw Mean Girls. I applaud her that she has gained some weight again and that her supple figure is back. Very good indeed.
She can be very sexy when she wants to. I even dig the freckles.
6. James replies at 18th February 2008, 1:59 pm :
Her name should be Freckles McSkincancer
7. Darren J Seeley replies at 18th February 2008, 2:09 pm :
I am against the grain here. I think this is a bad move. Bad as in it smells, no, reeks, of desperation. Dressing up like Monroe has been done a zillion times as well. How about Jane Russell for a change?
8. Crunchy replies at 18th February 2008, 2:11 pm :
dude freckles don’t mean you’re a sunbather James you retard. she had freckles when she was in parent trap
I agree with whoever said she REALLY should have just done Playboy, these are not only tacky but now free all over the internet.
And she’s no Marilyn :P
9. James replies at 18th February 2008, 2:18 pm :
@Crunchy: At what point did I say she was a “sunbather”? I was simply stating that she has horrid skin.
Agree 100% with DJS. She’d be suited to a remake of DESPERADO, if only for the title.
10. Bobby replies at 18th February 2008, 2:20 pm :
Uhhh… Not really good… I guess the thought of her being naked was better then the actual look. She’s definitely no Marilyn Monroe. Poor Lindsay… I guess from here will being seeing her on porn sites in no time…
Oh well…
~B
11. steven replies at 18th February 2008, 2:22 pm :
while i agree that dressing up like Marilyn has been done alot of times i think that because Bert Stern did the shoot was the main reason for Lohan doing this. i think Stern should’ve came up with a original shoot cause this was bound to get “she’s no marilyn” talkbacks
12. Robert(wolf) replies at 18th February 2008, 2:47 pm :
I agree that this is a good move for Lohan. But going nude like this was not a great start. I think posing for Playboy would have been MASSIVE with her natural hair color, not posing as someone who she looks nothing or has anything to do with really.
13. TJ replies at 18th February 2008, 2:51 pm :
I’m really saddened to say this but she’s better of leaving stuff to the imagination. She’s no Marilyn and those pictures are horrid.
14. carl replies at 18th February 2008, 3:20 pm :
Sick, gross, your all Ginger lovers.
15. ouija replies at 18th February 2008, 4:29 pm :
These pictures arent especially flattering of her. She has had better photo shoots, I see here going the same route as Tara Reid…$3000 an appearance…then total obscurity.
16. Cole replies at 18th February 2008, 4:42 pm :
Don’t think I can’t appreciate a nice pair of bazookas, but Lindsay Lohan is no Marilyn Monroe. So for her to “recreate” this isn’t only distasteful, it’s also pretty egotistical. She’s an attractive girl but she’s far from being considered “hot”.
Pam Anderson or Anna Nicole Smith in their prime were able to pull this off, but Lindsay Lohan? The only similarity is the drug use and the more drug use.
17. Koko replies at 18th February 2008, 5:00 pm :
Eww … Yuk. That girl is filth from the sewers.
I’m a little disturbed now … I’m speechless.
….. She looks like Carrot Top with tits.
18. Matt replies at 18th February 2008, 5:01 pm :
The Pics are nice, how ever I agree with who ever said it, She doesn’t pull off the blond so well, she was truly heart stopingly gorgeous when she was a red head (Mean Girls) I agree with Doug as well that Playboy would have done a WAYYYYYY better job with a shoot on her. That said it’s a shame that she’s dropped so low, she is a very intelligent woman and a decent actress, I think she just needs a long break from hollywood a real friend and a hug… oh well posing nude is good to I guess??
19. chris (the real one) replies at 18th February 2008, 5:49 pm :
no thank u. not to say lohan is ugly but these pics dont do anything for me, its a shame thats she so desperate she has to pose nude. even tho playboy wouldve had better pics i think it would be more acceptable to do it this way….it seems like these are artsy nude shots……but besides her nice titties, not a good pic set. she looks a lot better redheaded
20. Kristina replies at 18th February 2008, 6:38 pm :
Christ, the freckles…does she get one for every guy she fucks?
21. Matt replies at 18th February 2008, 6:48 pm :
Freckles are sexy. Period. well… at leased on redheads.
22. Vek replies at 18th February 2008, 7:06 pm :
I’d still fuck the shit out of here. Bad photos or not.
23. chris (the real one) replies at 18th February 2008, 7:41 pm :
LOL kristina…gold
24. Mattiac replies at 18th February 2008, 8:02 pm :
Nice!! I prefer the picture of her nice naked boobs. :D Slide 8 that is. Although I prefer her normal hair style. Yummy!
@Vek: Same here! :)
25. leeloo replies at 18th February 2008, 9:10 pm :
bleh.
what a tool.
26. Meli replies at 18th February 2008, 10:53 pm :
LOL - Kristina - another snigger out of me. :)
I saw this photos earlier and they are completely unflattering - can we say bad wig??? -sigh- Lindsay once had a good career ahead of her. IF she can keep clean and focus on the craft she could still have a future. This photo shoot…not the way to go. Playboy? Well, while I don’t approve (not that it matters), they would have done a better job.
27. Koko replies at 18th February 2008, 11:02 pm :
uuuugghhh… I don’t see any sex appeal at all. Just filth.
Filth. Filth. Filth.
I wouldn’t fuck her with a smurf dick.
28. Anthony replies at 18th February 2008, 11:47 pm :
Lindsay has a nicer bod than I expected to see. But I also find other 50’s starlets more attractive than Marylin, like Mamie Van Doren.
29. Henrik B replies at 19th February 2008, 1:56 am :
Uhm…wow?
I never realized Lindsays…size, for lack of a better word. Like Anthony says, a better body than expected.
She’s…hot, damn it!
A part from that I can’t really say if it’s a good or bad move, all I can say is I hope it’s a good move in the sense that if it helps get her life back in order then I’m all for it. It’d be a shame if it just plunges her deeper.
Same thing with Britney really. I don’t care for her music, I don’t care for her movie”career”, I just hope for her sake and her kids that she gets her life in order.
30. everysence replies at 19th February 2008, 2:54 am :
she’s got some big hooters.. but her face looks like a crackwhore :(.
31. kanthan replies at 19th February 2008, 4:20 am :
that skin is disgusting i cant even look at it without cringing
32. GyZ replies at 19th February 2008, 6:07 am :
I found the photos to be OK, at least they are free of the usual photo filters commonly unleashed on a series like this. I think this should be quite ’nuff to generate immense chit-chat and hype about Lohan, so these photos are probably successful already as she hardly had other plans with them than being hyped about for.
33. miles replies at 19th February 2008, 8:09 am :
she looks way hotter with red hair, i do not understand why she changes it.
34. LokitoMan replies at 19th February 2008, 8:33 am :
I don’t like her with blog hair… to be honest… she looks ugly….
35. ghing replies at 19th February 2008, 9:31 am :
Lindsay Lohan really looks hot and sexy with those pictures.. but i think i’ll still go for marilyn monroe..
I didn’t like some of the pictures of Lohan.. esp., those pic where she is facing sideways and her b**bs shows off..
on what i saw her bo*bs look so sag..
36. Kristina replies at 19th February 2008, 9:42 am :
I find this hilarious. There was a time when the internet would have exploded if she’d done a nudie spread. Now she does it and she gets ripped on. She doesn’t look good here at all. All the fabric hanging on her head in that one pic looks ridiculous, and she doesn’t even look fully awake.
And I think she’s taken the criticism over her blond hair to heart, since she’s recently gone back dark. There were pics of her at a WWE show recently(and WTF was she doing at a WWE show, anyway? Trying to fuck John Cena?) and her hair is reddish brown.
37. nbakid2000 replies at 19th February 2008, 11:57 am :
I saw the pictures. She looks like a burned out alkie. She didn’t look very good at all. The tattoo is very unsexy as well in the photos - they should’ve airbrushed them out.
All in all - meh. Give me Marilyn Monroe any day. And why the f*ck did they choose HER?
38. nbakid2000 replies at 19th February 2008, 11:58 am :
I saw the pictures. She looks like a burned out alkie. She didn’t look very good at all. The tattoo is very unsexy as well in the photos - they should’ve airbrushed it out.
All in all - meh. Give me Marilyn Monroe any day. And why the f*ck did they choose HER?
39. @spence replies at 19th February 2008, 2:31 pm :
proabalby get a lot shit for this, but i thought these pictures were pretty damn hot….i mean yeah i much rather have seen her as a brunette/reddish brown but still pretty hot pics…..